2/3/2012:  7-Inch Android Tablet $99 from Sprint With Two-Year Contract

Sprint, beginning on Sunday, Feb. 5, will sell a 7-inch Android Tablet running version 2.3, for $99.  to get this price one must sign a two-year data services contract.  The contracts provides for 1 GB per month of 3G data for $20 a month, 3 GB for $35 and 5GB for $80.

The Optik tablet, manufactured by ZTE, a Chinese company, has fair to less than fair specs.  Screen resolution of 1280 X 800 is better than some.  It has a relatively slow Qualcomm Snapdragon dual-core processor that runs at 1.2GHz speed, 16 GB of storage memory, and a 5 Megapixel camera and another 2 MP for front facing pictures.  The Optik also has a mini SD card slot.  The weakest part of the design is in the WiFi radio.  It will run 802.11 b/g, which is one generation behind the three-times faster “n” specification that most everyone else is offering now.  And it will soon be two generations behind when the 802.11 ac begin appearing later this year.

The China-based ZTE is making its debut into North America.  It holds No. 5 spot in the global mobile phone market for the last quarter.  It almost caught #4 LG Electronics in the most recent quarter. 

1/30/2012:  Kindle Fire Outsells Estimates

Now that the bean counters have finished their tally sheets, it appears that Amazon actually sold 6 million of the $199 Kindle Fire in the fourth quarter.  This estimates comes from Stifel Nicolaus, an analyst, who put this in his recent note.  Earlier prediction of Kindle Fire Sales were in the area of 5-million units  for the period.

This is an impressive figure given that Amazon came from nowhere in the tablet market, and its sales didn’t start until mid-November.  Apple last week said it had sold 15.4 million iPad tablets in the last quarter, more than double the number it sold for the same period in 2010.

Some have estimated that the Fire accounts for up to 40% of Android sales during its first month and a half of its existence.

1/29/2012:  ARM Ultrportables on Windows 8

The ultraportable laptop category of PC is soon to get a major boost.  ARM chips, which began their life in America primarily as the brains of cell phones, has since graduated to tablet computers, running both iOS and Android designs.  But soon, beginning in February, ARM designed for laptops will be enabled to run Windows 8. 

An ARM based ultraportable will not be seen immediately on dealer shelves—I would look for that much later in the year.  But it is strongly rumored that Microsoft will release an ARM-based version of Windows 8 to developers in February.  This release is enabled by the fact that, again, according to reliable reports, Windows 8 has become stable on the new platform.

Some laptops and tablets running Widows 8/ARM designs were shown at the recent Consumer Electronics Show in Las Vegas, but they were shown only behind glass walls, and nothing moved on the screens other than a fixed display sequence.  No hands were allowed to touch these devices—Win 8 was not yet stable enough to allow such liberties.  But, now, the project moves to the next stage where developers can begin testing the new OS on tablets and laptops of their own design.

The picture at right, taken at CES, shows Windows 8 running on an ARM designed device.

For those of us who use these types of machines, this is unambiguous good news.  ARM chips were originally designed to run by sipping only the slightest amount of juice—extended battery life was their reason for existing.  The only way this could be achieved was to reduce the instruction set that powered the functions of the chip.  Reduced Instruction Set Chips (RISC) were not new, but they found new life under the ARM design by being adapted for cell phones, smart phones, and, more lately, on tablets.  The iPad, iPhones, iPod and Android devices all use ARM designed chips.

What has given this design new life is the expansion of the RISC concept by introducing multiple cores in the central processing unit.  Apple’s iPad and iPhone ARM design use dual cores now.  And late last year quad-core designs were perfected, opening the larger tasks required by PCs to its domain.  Nvidia was the first fabricator to make a commercially available quad core design, and Asus was the first to market with its Tegra 3 ARM on the their Transformer Prime tablet.  Many other tablets will be seen in the coming months running Nvidia’s and other quad core ARM designs.

It is thought now that using an ARM design will reduce the price of a laptop by a couple of hundred dollars per unit.  Thee savings will be about the same whether the chip is fabricated by Texas Instruments, Qualcomm, Samsung, Nvidia, or Apple.  This means we could see fully functioning Windows 8 apps on ultraportables for $800 or less and even further as production costs are reduced by the economies of scale that invariably follow wider use.

Although there is no official announcement that Microsoft’s Office suite of apps will run under the ARM based version of Windows 8, unofficial reports say that all the Office apps run fine.  This development will be, I believe, one of the larger tech stories of 2012.  The practical implications are huge.

1/27/2012:  Moto Moves a Million

Motorola, in its quarterly statement released yesterday, assets that it shipped one million Android tablets during 2011.  The only tablet they sold during the year was the Xoom—their newer tablet, the XYBoard did not begin selling until 2012, although some could have been shipped in December.  The last quarter saw 200,000 units shipped, according to the report.

One million units is not great when compared with the 10.5 million Android tablets shipped during the year, but it may be enough to keep Motorola in the game.  Perhaps the XYBoard will sell better.

1/26/2012:  Android Tablets Close the Gap With iPad

At last there are real numbers that show the Android assault on the iPad is beginning to take effect. Although the data provided is of shipments—not sales to consumers—it can reasonably be assumed that the items shipped will eventually be sold. The shipments reported are for both the iPad and Android devices. The weakness in the data is that no distinction is made between shipments of 10-inch tablets and those of 7-inches. This is, in my view, an important distinction, since there is little basis for comparing a 7-inch screen with an iPad or 10.1-inch screen.

Regardless of the weaknesses of the data, it is all we have for now.  It is supplied by Strategy Analytics, a firm that advises Global 500 firms on technology issues. They specialize in tracking, analyzing and forecasting technology markets including consumer electronics and wireless devices.

According to their report, about 26.8 million tablets were shipping in the fourth quarter of 2011. Apple iOS devices accounted for 15.4 million units and Android about 10.5 million. Therefore, for the last quarter of 2011, the iPad had about 57 percent of the tablet market and Android at about 39 percent.

This is impressive when the same shipments are compared with the fourth quarter of 2010. In that year, as can be seen in the table below, Apple iOS shipments were 7.3 million units and Android 3.1 million. So, last year Apple’s share of the market was 69 percent and that of Android 29 percent.

For total units sales, Apple more than doubled its shipments and Android more tripled theirs.

This is good news for both Apple and the Android vendors. Android can compete with the iPad, but probably at lower prices overall, and the more capable Android 4.0 will probably help them compete with iOS.

Tablet Shipments Q4 10 vs Q4 11

It also convinces me that there is room for a Windows 8 tablet in the market. Windows 8 tablets are slated to debut later this year, probably in the third quarter, so the new OS will have only three or four months to work out the bugs before the 2012 Christmas selling season begins. I wouldn’t be surprised to see a slow start for Windows 8, because no matter how much in-house testing is done on a new OS, consumers always find ways to foul the best laid designs on engineers. Quick fixes are a fixture in this type of business, and wise buyers will be aware of early and unexpected problems. This may slow their initial adoption.

1/23/2012:  RIM Makes a Management Move

RIM has provided a press release that former co-CEOs Mike Lazaridis and Jim Balsillie are passing the reigns to the company’s former co-COO Thorsten Heins.  Mr. worked with Siemens AG before joining RIM in 2007.

The announcement is not a surprise.  It is clear that Mr. Lazaridis and Mr. Balsille failed in their attempt to turn BlackBerry around.  Last year RIM owned about 35.8 percent of U.S. smartphone market. By November of 2011, that number had dropped almost in half to just 16.6 percent.  The stock value has faired even worse.  RIM is in deep trouble, and there are many within the industry who doubt that the latest move will be enough to turn things around.

1/21/2012:  eBook Borrowing Doubles

The demand for e-books at some major public libraries more than doubled in December and January compared to a year ago.  The Boston Public Library, the nation’s oldest, reports eBook borrowing more than tripled in December, compared to December 2010. For the first half of January, more than 700 people a day tried to borrow an e-book, or added their name to a long waiting list for some of the more popular titles.

At the New York Public Library, 2,907 e-books and materials were checked out on Dec. 26, 2011, nearly double the 1,523 checked out on the same date in 2010.  The New York Public Library carries over 20,000 eBook titles.

The increase in demand is closely tied to so many eBook readers as gifts during the Christmas season.  And this last season saw a record in eReading device sales.  It is estimated that the Kindle Fire sold over f.5 million units this last season.

Public libraries are stressed with the influx of orders.  First, they are restricted to lending of their electronic titles.  Different publishers limit the number of times an electronic title can be loaned, and some publishers do not have electronic editions.  There are some publishers who publish electronic editions but refuse to sell to libraries.  

Waiting lists for popular titles are long.

1/16/2012: Windows 8 for October?

A Microsoft executive, in an interview at CES, mentioned that it is generally three years between major upgrades to Windows, implying that October of this year is a likely time for the final release of Windows 8.  He was careful to note that this was not an official statement, but one of historical continuity, more or less.

This is important to Microsoft, of course, but it is important to the entire industry, because Windows 8 will feature a touch-screen orientation written from scratch for the first time.  Although Windows 7 was patched to add touch operations, it remained a mouse-centric OS, and the touch interface was a kludge and clumsy add-on.  Windows 8, it is hoped, will remedy these deficiencies.

But on an even larger scale, Windows 8 will also be written to run on ARM chips for the first time.  ARM is the family of Reduced Instruction Set Computers (RISC) that has taken over the cell and smartphone markets as well as tablets.  Apple uses a dual core ARM design for the iPad3, and iPhone.  Samsung, Toshiba, Motorola, Texas Instruments, Qualcomm, Acer, Asus and many others produce tablets or parts for tablets that use ARM architecture as the CPU on their devices.  Plus, the new generation of quad-core ARM chips brings its raw processing power up several notches to where it can now match the Intel designs in horsepower, at least ways important to tablet and general PC use

Of course none of the existing ARM-based tablets can run Windows.  Rather they operate on iOS, Android or QNX.  This means that owners of tablets of these devices will not be able to run any of the Windows’ Office Suite of productivity applications– Word for Windows, Excel, PowerPoint, etc.  And this limitation is the major stumbling block for making the tablet a computer capable of producing content rather than merely consuming it.

Microsoft apparently has its collective mind set on having a new generation of tablets using ARM designs but running Windows 8 as the operating system.  Owners of such a tablet could purchase an ARM-compatible Office Suite and thus not have to give up using their familiar productivity applications.

I would prefer to see Microsoft write a special version of the Office Suite for ARM chips using Android or iOS, but this probably won’t happen at first if ever.  Microsoft does sell operating systems as well as specific applications for productivity, so it seem reasonable to expect them to keep their legacy apps for their own customers. 

For now, and for the near future, iPad and Android tablet owners will have to be satisfied with working around the problem with Dropbox or other cloud solutions, but none of these solutions allow for easy creation or editing of Word, etc. documents.  However a new entry into the Office-Suite-for-iPad  category of cloud computing, Onlive Desktop, offers the most complete solution to this problem.  I will have a review of this new app in the next few days.

1/15/2012:  Sony Shows Ultraportable at CES

Sony is thinking ultrabook.  But, it doesn’t have one ready to sell yet.  It did show a preproduction model, however, but no one could put their hands on it.  From the view provided the ports can be seen: 2 USB ports including 1 USB 3.0 port. There’s also an HDMI port, VGA port, headphone jack, Ethernet jack, and a card reader which supports SD cards and Sony Memory Stick Pro Duo.

The thin laptop is also the same thickness front and back, abandoning the MacBook Air’s design of sloping to a near razor’s edge at the front.

Sony would not provide any pricing or availability information on their new ultra, so we can only surmise that it will come in a 3lbs or less, given its 13.3-inch screen.  Other specs will follow when they become available.

1/5/2012:  Acer has a New Iconia Tab

Acer is updating the 10.1-inch tablet with their new model, the Iconia Tab 200.  Their new entry into the crowded Android tablet market has graphics with a 1280 X 800 pixel screen and an NVIDIA Tegra 2 dual core processor that runs at 1 GHz.  These are fairly average numbers for tablets on the market today.

Acer insists the new model will be available in stores on January 15th, and, happily, its price will start at $329 at the low end with 8 GB memory.  The 16 GB model will sell at $349.

  This is good news for those looking an Android tablet.  The first wave of Android 10.1-inch tablets were priced at $499, and none sold well.  But, those prices have begun to fall.  It seems to me that a $300 entry price may have some chance of selling a significant number of units.

The Iconia 200 will not ship with Android 4.0 Ice Cream Sandwich, but it will be up-graded from Honeycomb 3.2 to the newer Operating System in February. 

Lenovo Revamps Their ThinkPad Line with Thin and Light and a Hybrid Intel/ARM Model

Lenovo is redefining the ThinkPad line of notebooks, going with thinner, lighter models and instant-on features that are generally redefining notebooks in the new year.

A most interesting model is their X1 series of notebooks.  The X-series has always featured  ultra-small designs, and usually featured the most powerful ultras one could find.  Expense was never an objective for this line. 

The new X1 Hybrid is well within this tradition.  It features a fanless “Instant Media Mode” of operation that does not load Windows or rely on an Intel processor.  Rather Lenovo has put a Qualcomm dual-core processor on the motherboard that runs on a version of Android when the Intel processor is not running.

This feature allows many functions to be completed without using the more powerful Intel i5 or i7 capabilities.  Web surfing, video and picture viewing, check email or listen to music—all can be done using the Qualcomm ARM chip while the Intel chip is turned off.

Among the benefits of this configuration is that the battery life is doubled to 10-hours, and an instant awakening from an idle mode.  If more heavy duty work is required, Windows apps can be invoked by starting up the Intel engine.

The weight of the new X1 is 3.7-pounds chassis,  a 13-inch (1366 x 768) Gorilla Glass display. It’ll be offered with Core i3, i5 and i7 processors, a 3G radio and a slice battery that adds up to five more hours of battery life. It’ll be available sometime in the second quarter for $1,599 and up.

The dimensions are not published, but it will probably about the same thickness of last year’s model, so it cannot bear the new definition of Intel’s Ultrabook specifications, but it will be still be thin compared with the older line of Thinkpads.  It will also have the fabulous keyboard that is unique to Thinkpads.  The Android Marketplace will not be available to this version of Android.

There are many new Lenovo models announced that do qualify for the Intel definition of Ultrabooks, and they will be detailed in another post.

1/3/2012:  Asus to Debut New 7-inch Tablet at CES

Asus has released the picture at left of their new Eee Memo Pad, a 7-inch tablet that is run by a 1.2 GHz Snapdragon dual core processor and supports 16GB to 64GH of internal storage.  It will have a built in 3G and WiFi, with a screen resolution of 1,280 X 800. 

No word on pricing yet, but it will most likely be shown at the up-coming CES in Las Vegas on January 10th.  The new tablet is slated to be introduced in Asia before making it to America.

RIM puts BlackBerry Playbook on Sale

Research in motion has put its Blackberry Playbook on sale from its web site for $299.  The odd part of this story is that the price of the 16GB, 32GB and 64GB units all sell at the same price.  They are probably looking to sell out their existing inventory, so the larger memory units will probably go first. 

It makes me wonder if RIM will stay in the tablet business given their terrible experience with their first try.  But, they have a large installed base of business accounts that want tablets, so they may feel the heat to come out with a new, improved tablet to satisfy this critical part of their market.

1/1/2012:  Sony’s S Tablet Price is Cut $100

Happy New Year!  I look forward to an exciting 2012, with hundreds of new products slated for introduction over the next twelve months.  I also look forward to lower prices on many products that help readers in their quest for convenience in pursuing their hobby.

To start the new year off, Sony is reducing the price of their S Tablet by $100.  A brand new 16GB model of the S will now retail for $399, and the 32GB model will hereafter sell for $499.

Their Android S Tablet has generally had good reviews.  It is often the second choice to the iPad2, coming in ahead of the Galaxy Tab 10.1.  Some of the reviewers put it just behind the Galaxy.

The screen size of the S Tablet is an odd 9.4-inches, but its operation is similar to the 10.1-inches of most Android devices and the iPad2’s 9.7-inch screen.

With its ability to play PlayStation games, it was expected to sell well, but has not generated the revenue Sony anticipated.  There is a review of this model here at ereadersreview.net(Click here for review)

Ray Hendon

Ultraportables, which include the newest incarnation of thin and light laptops, the Ultrabook, are thought by some to be a threat to tablet computers.  The instant-on capability of Ultrabooks are believed to be especially attractive to those who have been buying tablets because of this feature. 

It appears likely to me that Ultrabooks and other thin and light laptops will do well in the market place, especially when their prices fall a few hundred dollars.  But whether they will dampen any of the enthusiasm for tablets is another matter.  Personally I think both form factors satisfy separate needs for different users.

One feature of the new Ultrabooks that will help resolve the question is whether they will serve their owners as competent eReaders.  Surely there are some prospective buyers who would prefer to own only one device rather than two—but only if the one could do the work of two.  Can an Ultrabook do both heavy duty computing and convenient eReading?  Can one design satisfy both these needs?

Certainly a dedicated eReader or a tablet have some advantages over a laptop, even a thin and light one.  Reading electronic books, for example is probably done best by a device that closely emulates the look and feel of a book.  The popularity of the Kindle and Nook are thought to owe much of their success to their similarity to printed books.

How essential is the look and feel,  though, to those who read a lot.   This article takes a look at the possibility of using these new, thin and light computers as an eReader.

To put this question to a practical test, I loaded the top three eReading applications to an 11.6” screen Asus UX21 to see how they worked.  The applications chosen to test are:

Amazon’s Kindle App for PCs, Macs, iPad, iPhone and Android devices

• 
• Barnes and Noble’s Nook Application for PC, Mac, iPad, iPhone  and Android devices
• 
   

   

   

• Sony’s Reader Application for PC, Mac and Android devices

  

To give you a taste of the difference, I have taken screen shots of random pages from eBooks on the three applications I mentioned.

Beginning with Amazon, a screen shot of George Eliot’s Daniel Deronda, is displayed in the two column format for laptop viewing. The screen shot is taken of the Kindle application for PCs.

Screen of Kindle Reader in Two Column Format

The Kindle app is widely praised for its versatility of layout options, underlining, comments, bookmarks and especially its syncing abilities.  This app also has go-to options that ease navigation, and dictionary lookup for a highlighted word.  All these features work on Ultrabooks. 

Amazon also has a user friendly policy of allowing you to direct any book in your library to be sent to any device on your registered list of devices. Amazon is indifferent as to which device or how many you use for any their electronic titles.  It treats them all the same and syncs them in an effortless way. The moment I registered my latest laptop, the Asus ZenBook UX21, all books in my library were immediately available for reading.

The strongest features of Amazon is, in my view, the ease of use of its website.  It is easy to find books, send them to the device of your choice, and generally navigate their vast site.

Equally strong is the selection of books, magazines and newspapers. They claim over a million titles, but that includes some categories such as “Singles” that represent a new class of literature that is generally shorter than a book but longer than an article. 

The worst feature of Amazon is that they insist on using a proprietary format for their eBook files.  It has an AZW extension and works only on Kindle software or hardware.  Although all the free sites I use give the option of downloading their books in the AZW format, in practice it is not terribly inconvenient.  Amazon also can read PDF files, and they will convert your Word for Windows documents to a format that allows you to put them in you Kindle library.

The other downside to Amazon is that they use DRM (digital rights management) on everything, so there is no cutting or pasting using anything in the AZW format. 

The Nook eReader software also provides a good reader experience. The screen shot below is from one of their pre-DRM works. Don’t be fooled by the small typeface. My screen capture utility shrunk it because the Nook takes up more of the horizontal space of the computer screen than the Kindle reader, so it has to cut the size down to fit within the pasted space. In practice, the Nook screen is as readable as any other.

Screen shot from the Nook Reader using the dual pane format

All the formatting and user options are available for the Nook reader–font size, margins, highlighting, lookup, go-to. And the B&N syncing feature is excellent between devices, and they offer their reader software app for a wide range of devices.

As far as eReading goes, it is hard to find much to prefer of B&N over Amazon or vice versa.  Both are excellent and have almost identical features.

The same is true for selection of books. B&N’s inventory is huge, and they have a good selection of free public domain books—as good as or better than Amazon’s.

Nook uses the ePub format, as does Sony, although both will read many other formats as well.  They do not read Amazon’s proprietary AZW file format, however.

Something of an oddity: The Nook reader treats all ePub software as DRM protected, so they do not allow cutting or pasting of non-DRM books.  Even on the iPad, whose own iReader app allows cutting and pasting of non-DRM protected material the  Nook does not.

Sony’s reader app provides a good reading experience. The screen shot below is from an ePub file of a non-DRM version of Sherlock Holmes.

Screen of Sony Reader’s Dual Column Layout

As with the Nook, the Sony Reader software uses more of the landscape screen to display its materiel than the Kindle app, so my clipping software has to reduce it to fit the pasting space. But Sony gives one plenty of formatting options and page control.

Sony lags both Amazon and B&N with book selection and syncing ability.  Their books are generally priced high; they have few free books, and their selection doesn’t match its two larger competitors.

Sony makes its reader software available to fewer devices—no iPad, no iPhone, no BlackBerry, for example.  They have syncing available to the three types of devices they support, but I have not tried it personally.

I like the Sony reader app for its ability to read almost any kind of document regardless of format, except, of course, Kindle documents. I will always have their app installed on my computers in case a particular book is not available in the Kindle format.  And they allow cut and paste options for non-protected books.

I find all three of the reader software about equally enjoyable to use. The differences in layout and options are not terribly important. I find I use the Kindle app more than the others because I find more books on their site I like, and I like to sync the books among all my devices. Still, I maintain active use of the Nook and the Sony Readers.

Summary:

First, the reality of the size and convenience of specialized eReaders and tablets makes it clear that they have the advantage. It is not possible for an ultrabook, weighing in at 2.9 pounds, to be as convenient to use as a 7-inch tablet or even the pound and a half iPad.

However, it is also inconvenient to carry two devices if one will do. So, there will be occasions when a thin and light laptop could be a suitable substitute for a dedicated eReader or tablet. 

At bottom, all of these tested apps work well on an Ultrabook. And they would work just as well with the software from other vendors such as Kobo or Blio. If your eReading preferences include comic books, magazines or children’s books, then you might like a specialty reader designed for the formats unique to these publications.

While all the eReading apps work well on an Ultrabook, it still may not be your preferred way of reading electronic texts.  But they are completely usable as a primary or secondary eReader. The choice of one over another is more dependent on which site you prefer to use because of its particular strengths than to the characteristics of their eReades.

From my experience, I have given away my Kindle reader. I simply do not want to carry another device with me in my travels. Now that I have a 7-inch tablet, the Samsung Galaxy Tab, I use it as my eReader of choice because of its lightness and ease of holding in one hand. I use the iPad for e-reading infrequently, but there are occasions when it comes in handy. Its weight, though, makes it a second choice, especially for long reading times. 

I rarely use a PC or my ultraportable for reading, but if I do it will be on the ultraportable.  Its lightness and instant-on feature does make it a better choice than the older, heavier laptops, but it is not as convenient to carry as a tablet.

An ultraportable may not be your favorite way of reading electronic texts, but it serves as a completely satisfying vehicle for reading if you want to carry only one device with you or if an occasion arises when it is all you have to use.

Pew Research has an ongoing project on Internet and American Life, and one of their questions is do you own a Tablet computer or eReader.  The latest December/January questionnaire was recently competed and the data suggests that the number of people who own at least one of the two items has doubled over the same period last year.

29 percent admitted owning at least a tablet or an eReader.  This is up from 19 percent last year.  The percentage of people who own a tablet jumped to 19 from 10 between mid-December and early January. E-book reader ownership also rose to 19 percent from 10 percent of U.S. adults.

Men and women were equally likely to own tablets, and the likelihood of tablet ownership was higher for people with higher household incomes, the report found. Those with higher levels of education were also more likely to own tablets than those who completed fewer years of school.

E-readers, meanwhile, were slightly more common among women.

The data from Pew Research is of a high quality.  Their samples on these questions runs form 2000 to 3000+, so the confidence in the sample results is much higher than from a typical political preference survey which usually run around 500 responders in the sample.

The two leaders in the equipment owned by the respondents is the iPad for tablets and Kindles for eReaders.  There are other brands, of course, but these two are the undisputed leaders in their respective categories.

The most surprising result is the similarity of eReaders and tablets, both being about half the total respondents.

For those of us who those who own both an iPad and a Windows PC or laptop, it is not possible to use the iPad for Microsoft’s Office Suite of programs.  Microsoft has not written a special version of their legacy software for the iPad, so one must find a workaround if you ever want to use the iPad for writing or editing Word-compatible documents. 

There are workarounds, but none are very convenient.  I use Dropbox extensively, since I have more than one Windows machine, and it is possible with a companion app, DocsToGo,or QuickOffice to work with Word for Windows documents contained in the iPad’s  Dropbox app.  Is is convenient that Dropbox also works on the iPad , but it takes some doing to get the documents in its file system in a Word for Windows format when using it.  It can be done, but there are more steps to perform, and more steps slow you down, and still do not give you the formatting options available in Word.

Over the weekend, though, I picked up a new cloud application, OnLive Desktop, that allows me to use Word, Excel, Power Point and Paint on my iPad and have the files accessible to my other Windows computers.  Onlive Desktop is not like DocstoGo  or QuickOffice, where the iPad editing is done in a text window that is formatted for Docx use only when saved.  Onlive Desktop uses the actual Windows versions of Word, etc. to do the document creation and editing.  It’s all in the cloud; your documents are not stored on the iPad or your windows machine, but they are accessible from all your Windows and iOS devices.

The visual screen on the iPad is exactly what you see when viewing Word for Windows on your PC, and the commands and key-stroking are the same.  All the formatting options are there, too.  Even the Windows key short-cuts for selecting texts, cutting, moving to the clipboard and pasting are active.

One minor inconvenience, though, is that these commands are not usable when you leave the cloud environment and return to the iPads domain.  For example, it is not possible to copy an Office document to the clipboard and then paste it into an app on an iPad– no emailing or pasting into the iPad’s iWorks apps. 

However, if you use your PC to open or edit the document, the cut and paste works fine.  You can copy you Windows document from the cloud and paste it into a new Windows document or email screen on your PC.  You can also “save and send” the document from a PC but not from the iPad—that option is  “grayed out” on the iPad file menu.

The good news about Onlive Desktop is that it is free, at least for 2GB of cloud storage.  So you can download the app to your iPad at no cost.  The bad news is that it cannot be activated until you open an account on your PC.  Plus, once this step is taken, you can still not log on to your account with the iPad until you get permission from Onlive Desktop via email notification.  It took a day or so for all this to go through—it seems Onlive has a limited capacity to add new users so they tell you when it is your turn to get on board.

Once these preliminary steps are taken I have had no problem in logging on or off with any of my devices.  After using it for a day or two I find it was worth the effort because of the ease of use and seamless syncing between devices. 

As far as creating documents on the iPad, the relatively commodious iPad virtual keyboard does not work in the cloud, but a small one is made available by the cloud app when you need it.  But entering text on any virtual keyboard is too onerous to think about, so I tried my blue tooth  keyboard.  The good news is that it works fine with the cloud app.  Also the iPad keyboard that physically connects to the iPad—the one sold by Apple– also works with the cloud app, if you don’t mind turning your head sideways to read your text.  The Apple keyboard for iPad mounts only in a vertical, portrait, mode.  But the cloud app displays only in the landscape mode.  Forget using the Apple keyboard for the iPad—blue tooth is your only option.

One last note for those who may have an Android tablet: my heterogeneous environment does not stop with iPad and a Windows PC.  It also includes the Samsung Galaxy Tab (7-inch version) which runs under Android.  Although their Android app is not yet available for Onlive, it will be according to their Desktop site.  No time frame is provided, however.  Not that I would like to use such a small device for word processing, but I can envision a time when it would come in handy, especially with an external keyboard.

Overall, the new app is a welcome addition to my iPad.  I can now press it into a production mode if I have left my laptop behind.

Reports out the last few days point to Barnes and Noble looking at ways of selling some or all of their Nook line of eRedeaders.  The problem is an odd one.  By most measures the Nooks have been successful products.  They competed effectively with other eReading devices, and the Nook Color almost singlehandedly defined a new niche in the tablet category of computers.

The bottom line, however, is that the sales success has not been translated to B&N’s bottom line:  the large book chain has not found  a way to sell their fancy new devices at a profit.  Development costs are high, as are the costs of keeping the products up to date in a fast-paced technology industry. 

B&N is said to be looking at two options:  The first is to sell the brand to another firm that could afford to continue developing the Nooks and to promote them in American and international markets.  It is understood, apparently, that these products need further development and to be promoted more than they are now if they are to become profitable.

The second option would be to sell a large percentage of the products to another firm but keep  a minority interest.  This would allow B&N to reap some of the expected profits from the line as it reached critical mass.  And it would free them from the need to raise additional capital.

Lurking behind the issue is that B&N is not currently profitable.  Furthermore, if they sell or drop the line of eReaders, what they are left with is a dinosaur brick and mortar book chain that is steadily losing ground to the same digital markets that the Nook has helped define.

Some analysts feel the Nook is doomed and will eventually disappear.  The price pressure applied by Amazon is simply too much for each of their products, the e-Ink Reader that sells for $100, the Nook Color for $199 and the Nook Tablet for $249.  At these prices, there is no margin left for profit and not enough money coming in to continue their development efforts.

If there is to be a buyer it must obviously be one with deep pockets.  Microsoft and Google qualify as having deep pockets.  But do they have the compelling interest?  It is hard to see Microsoft blowing itself up even beyond their present size to take on such a different breed of cat.  It is not an area in which they have much of a proprietary interest.  They are not hardware manufactures at their core; neither are they book sellers, electronic or otherwise.

The case for Google is better.  They have an electronics bookstore, although it is not doing particularly well.  And they make the Android OS that runs many of the eReaders, both e-Ink and LCD types.  They would have better bargaining power with the publishers for the electronic titles they would sell.  Perhaps a partnership would be possible for them.

It also seems that Sony could be interested.  Their selection of electronic titles lags B&N and Amazon, so they would gain traction in an industry that is not in their wheelhouse.  They make eReader hardware now, so there would be some duplication in picking up the Nook line.  However, Sony could use the Color Nooks to enhance their offerings in the 7-inch segment of the tablet market.  Furthermore, Integrating these two sides of the Pacific might me more than Sony could do given their current state of struggle in the computer market.  This makes them a longshot, in my view.

Motorola was one of the first American firms to get their 10.1-inch tablet to market after the iPad’s introduction.  The Xoom, as they named it, was not reviewed well, nor did it do particularly well in the market.  It was generally considered too heavy, too thick and too clumsy to use as well as too expensive for what you got.

Sales were not strong despite having strong backing from Verizon, who brought out a 3G version they sold in their own stores.  Tech Crunch put early sales in April at about 100,000, which would equal the iPad sales the first couple of minutes after it was introduced.  By July an estimated 440,000 were shipped (which does not mean sold).  Over the same period Apple sold 9.4 million iPads.

This made it obvious to Motorola’s executive crew that something needed changing, and they did set out to do just that.  Now we have their answer, the Xyboard,, shown below.  Both the 10.1-inch screen and the new 8.2-inch are shown side by side.

The models shown are the 4G devices which will sold by Verizon.  The 10.1-inch will list at $530, $630 and $730 for the 16GB, 32GB and 64GB models respectively.

The 16GB 8.2 lists at $429 with a two year data contract.

The reviewers of the new tablets generally feel that Motorola did not learn enough from their previous failure.  Both are still priced too high, and the on/off button is still on the back side along with the volume control rocker, making both invisible while holding it to read the screen.  And the general operations are too clumsy and slow.

The Engadget review is Here  This review also features Engadget’s video.

An independent video from MobileTech  is shown below.

ZDnet also has a review Here.

Neither of the featured reviewers recommend the Xyboard tablets.  The concluding remark by Joseph Volpe of Engadget: “With ASUS’ quad-core tablet king already available for order, you’ll be hard pressed to find a compelling reason to buy what Moto’s selling.”

On the technical side the Xyboard has a 1.2GHz dual core ARM-based processor, and it is thinner and weighs less than the Xoom.  It has a mini HDMI and mini SD card slot and comes with 4GB of RAM, running Honeycomb.  An ice Cream Sandwich upgrade is promised.

The new screen is vastly improved with a TFT-IPS display and it also features stylus input.  The reviewers are not strong on the stylus operations, however.

I would expect a WiFi-only model to be on the market soon.  A lower price and no data contract would make it more attractive, but there would still be the poor performance that reviewers note when it comes to screen operations.  Perhaps Ice Cream Sandwich will fix that problem, although Motorola has put their own skin in place, and neither reviewer likes it.

All in all, the new tablets do not get thumbs up, but they will surely sell some because of the LTE capabilities offered by Verizon.

12/21/2011:  Fire Fixes Flaws

From David Pogue: “Animations are sluggish and jerky — even the page turns that you’d think would be the pride of the Kindle team. Taps sometimes don’t register. There are no progress or ‘wait’ indicators, so you frequently don’t know if the machine has even registered your touch commands. The momentum of the animations hasn’t been calculated right, so the whole thing feels ornery.”

+A software update, sent out over the air on Tuesday, fixes these balky characteristics.  According to reviews, the carousel stops spinning on a dime; it takes only one tap to open an application, and one tap opens something much faster than before. and page turns are faster and smoother.

There was one enhancement, too.  The user can control which apps are in the home carousel.

A good fix for the Fire that makes a significant difference in user satisfaction.

12/19/2011:  Lenovo Has Quad-core 10.1-inch Tablet in The Oven

A report from DigiTimes, a newspaper based in Taiwan that keeps a close eye on electronics manufacturers in that island nation, says that Lenovo has a quad-core tablet ready to begin production in January.   It will be called the K2, which will be an update of the existing K1.  The new device will feature an  NVIDIA Tegra 3 quad-core processor, up to 2GB of RAM, and Google Android 4.0 Ice Cream Sandwich operating system.

12/17/2011:  7-inch iPad Coming in Late 2012?

DigiTimes, an infamous reporter of random rumors strikes again with a report that Apple is buying oodles of 7.85-inch displays from LG and Aupotronics.  Presumably these purchases are intended for use by the Cupertino firm, and it probably isn’t for a new laptop.  More likely it would be for the often speculated 7-inch tablet, a sort of mini-iPad. 

The rumor would put delivery close to the end of 2012.  DigiTimes has been right in some of their reporting, given the close relationship they have with the Taiwan firms that actually manufacture many of the world’s laptops.  But, they have also been wrong, so there is no way of knowing yet.

RIM’s BlackBerry Playbook  sold about 850,000 units for the three quarters since its introduction.  %00,000 weere sold in its first quarter, 200,000 the next and now, 150,000 in the last quarter that ended November 26th.  RIM has been working overtime trying to get sales going on their tablet.  They have sent out multiple OS fixes, and they promise a much improved model in February.  But, the main emphasis for boosting their sales has been to lower the price to $200.  this has helped, and it is rumored that after Christmas selling season is over they will keep the $200 price point as permanent.

This will make it hard for other 7-inch tablets to get more than $200, with the Kindle Fire selling at that price, too.  This is good news for those who are considering a 7-inch model to supplement their digital experiences.

12/12/2011: Kindle Fire to Get Software Update

Amazon will push an update to Kindle Fire owners before the end of the year, according to a report in the New York Times.  The new software will offer better performance, improvements in multitouch navigation, and the ability to edit the list of recently used items that show up on the home screen.

All of the enhancements are in response to consumer complaints that have been documented in reviews posted by the early adopters of the new 7-inch tablet.  Nearly 33% of early buyers have given the Fire three star or less ratings.  This compared with only 11% of the first Kindle buyers some years ago.

12/08/2011:  The Nook Tablet Ships a Million

It is clear now that the 7-inch segment of the tablet market will never be the same since Amazon and Barnes and Noble brought out their 7-inchers at prices that translate to roughly half the prevailing prices at the time.

Amazon’s success with the Kindle Fire has been widely publicized, and now Barnes and Noble is said to have shipped a million units of their Nook Tablet since its mid-November debut.

Neither the Fire nor the Nook Tablet are as full featured as their competition from Samsung or HTC, to name a couple, but the pricing at that end of the market will never again support a $400 price, much less the $500 price point at which they were initially offered.

An example is offered by RIM’s BlackBerry Playbook.  Even at the deeply discounted price of $199, they are expected to have sold only about 150,000 units for the entire quarter.  Admittedly the $199 price point was not in effect during the entire quarter, but with Amazon selling four to five million since mid November and Barnes and Noble at least taking shipments on a million units, this can spell only disaster for the PlayBook.  I wonder if it can be fixed.

The sales of Samsung 7-inch tabs and HTC are not yet known, but it cannot be expected to be much.  Altough HTC has reduced the price on their 7-incher to $199, I wonder how much they can sell.  The original Galaxy Tab is now selling for $200 with a 3G contract.  It is hard to see that the newer models of the same size will sell much at their $400 price points.

12/01/2011: Electronic Reading Continues it Rapid Growth

Electronic reading continues to grow at a fast pace as it continues to grab a larger slice of the book sales pie. Amazon reported today that they now offer over 900,000 eBooks in English and other languages, all offered for sale through their website.

Following this announcement, Juniper Research, a firm that follows the industry, released a report which foresees sales of electronic books to reach almost $10 billion by 2016. Sales for this year are estimated to be about $3.2 billion.

Juniper attributes the rise to the growing inventory of eBooks and in the number of eReading devices on the market. They also say that the spread of eReading to smartphones, tablets and other mobile devices is expected to contribute to the growth. The research firm expects that tablets alone may account for as much as 30 percent of eBook downloads by 2016.

Posted via DraftCraft app

The  research firm IDC has reported year-to-date sales on tablets, and it revels a 264.5 percent surge in tablet sales worldwide from the third quarter of last year to this year.  Third quarter shipments for this year are estimated at 18.1 million units.   This amounts to a growth of 23.9 percent from the second quarter of this year.

Apple’s iPad led the field with 11.1 million units shipped during the 3rd quarter.  This is just over 61 percent of all tablets shipped during the period.  Samsung’s tablet line, which includes both 10.1 and 7-inch models, was in second place with 5.6 percent of the total worldwide shipments. 

HP’s quickly discontinued TouchPad placed third by shipping 903,000 units, yielding a 5 percent market share. 

The Kindle Fire did not begin shipping until the middle of November, so they had no 3rd quarter shipments.

Apple’s dominance of this market is expected to diminish in the 4th quarter, however.  IDC estimates that Android-based tablets, which include the Samsung tablets and the Kindle Fire, will increase their market share to 40.3 percent  and the iPad will fall to 59 percent.  Much of the increase for Android devices is attributable to the amazing success of the Kindle Fire.

Specific estimates for the Nook Color and Nook Tablet were not provided, but it is widely believed that these Barnes and Noble products will also contribute to the decline in market share enjoyed by the iPad.  Both of their tablets have enjoyed strong sales over the final quarter of the year.

The data leave little doubt that there is a wider market for the 7-inch form factor than has been seen before the Fire and Nook tablets were introduced.  Certainly the price points of $199 for the Fire and Nook Color and $249 for the Nook Tablet have had much to do with the surge in popularity of the smaller devices.  Prior to this development, the 7-inch models were listed at $499, and they had failed to move.  Amazon and Barnes and Noble changed that dynamic with unambiguous clarity.

2011 looks especially good for this new form factor.  IDC estiates that by the end of the year total worldwide shipments will come in a 63.3 million units shipped.  Next year should be even better.

Of all the Android-based tablets that have been brought to market this near, none have made any significant progress against the leader, the Apple iPad, except the recently introduced Kindle Fire.

Wisely avoiding a head-to-head competition with the iPad, Amazon chose a smaller form factor and one oriented more to the e-reader market and its needs than to the wider audience that the iPad appeals to.  Yet the Fire is, after all, still an Android-based machine, but with extensive customization of the interface and tight integration with all of Amazon’s products and services. 

Now we have the beginning of estimated sales data, and the data supports the wisdom of Amazon in doing with their new tablet what they did.  A business information services company, HIS says:

“. . .Amazon will ship 3.9 million Kindle Fire tablets during the last three months of 2011, giving the company a 13.8 percent share of tablet shipments in the fourth quarter, beating out the 4.8 percent held by Samsung. Apple is pegged to control 65.6 percent of the market.”

The same data also shows that Barnes and Noble did a good job on their new tablet, the Nook Tablet.  It has established itself solidly behind Samsung in fourth place with around 4% of the market. 

The success of the Fire, specifically, shows the marketing muscle of Amazon, and is a tribute to their design team—as is the Nook Tablet.  The iPad can be taken on, but the most successful firm in doing it did it with a smaller (e-reader-sized) screen and a reduced functionality.  But, more importantly, it also comes in less than half the price of the iPad.  These factors, coupled with Amazon’s loyal customer base and marketing muscle, explain much of their success.

This success story may give other manufacturers some hope, but it also a warning.  Android cannot take on iOS directly.  Their interface is not as polished or consistent, although I hope the newest version, 4.0, will go some distance in closing this gap. 

But close is not good enough in the tablet market.  A price reduction is mandatory for those who aspire to take on Apple.  Look at the failures of Motorola’s Xoom, RIM’s BlackBerry Playbook and HP’s tablet.  Close isn’t enough. 

BlackBerry, similar to HP, has found, perhaps a sweeter spot at $200 than at $500, but it is far from clear that their 7-incher is yet a viable product.  This venerable firm had to take a half-a-billion dollar write-down on their existing inventory this last quarter.  I can’t see how this is good news for anyone but to the guys and gals from Cupertino.

Another piece of good news for those of us who buy this stuff, is that the 7-inch segment of the tablet market may have found its proper place.  At $200, it is viable.  The problem with this is that no one can make and sell a good quality 7-inch tablet at that price.  It is reported by those that follow the accounting statements and finances of Amazon that the Fire costs them a dollar or two more than $200—but they can make up the difference with the sale of all the other stuff they sell.  Samsung, HTC, Motorola, Toshiba and countless others don’t have this luxury.

Perhaps I should exempt Motorola from this category, however, because it is now owned by Google.  It is understood that Google does have aspirations to rival Amazon in the sale of books and other stuff, and they have made moves in that area.  But the Xoom is supposedly an autonomous division of Google, so on their own, the executives of that division could not sell their product for less than it costs to produce it.  Google has some organizational issues to deal with if they want their product to compete in this market.  They may have to adopt the old Gillette strategy of giving away the razor to make their profit on the blades.